There is no denying therefore that the corporate structure may change the effect of changes that may be caused from the positions of its factors in the organization “(…) (Soldevilla, 1972, p.412), just tell us Espinoza, analysis of these factors explain the differences between the organizations and help to identify the contingent variables affecting the institution. This requires two steps by (Bueno Campos, 1996), the first, study the organization as a Macroorganizativa is ie, structural design and Micro-organizations from the behavior, processes and functions, the second identifies the contingency variables, which he termed as the external causes or context that are sources of change or because of existing conditions, all with the aim to establish the influence of these on the Macro and Microorganizacion.
Explaining the organizational reality and as you can get competitive advantages of the variables that affect Theory Features Contingency is manifested in this regard, which focuses its attention on the external environment of the company, giving priority to what happens outside the organization before you dig into the internals of the organizational structure. Source: Jim Donovan Goldman. This approach seeks a balance between the two contexts, where the organization get the most out of their environmental circumstances to ensure its success as a company. It is considered the external factors which are divided by (Hall, 1973), on general terms and specific influences. The first variables are aspects such as technological, economic, legal and political, while the latter are composed of aspects that particularly affect the organization, such as other organizations or key individuals..