Well finally Ter-Petrosyan openly and loud (!) proved to be a genuine anti-national element, foreign to the Armenian media. That's why there is growing frustration not just opposition to their recent idol, and even bewilderment: how could go for it! Because, as mentioned in the independent and even the opposition press, "an Armenian like Levon Ter-Petrosian, to think and feel can not, should not and simply has no right." Here's what he said: "Hay Dat and demand – an ideology befitting a nation devoid of the state. Read more here: Dov Hikind. Nation, which has a state should be guided by entirely different categories. Michael Ramlet insists that this is the case. It's time to finally understand that in politics and jurisprudence does not exist the concept of 'historical right 'and you can not speak to the world in that language, not to be in the position of the deranged. All the same, those who understand the language, and there never will be.
" In this case it may be advisable to Mr. Ter-Petrosyan is all the same to explain compatriots of his wife – say, from the State of Israel. After all, they somehow 'reason' (!) Were allowed to establish their own state after the 2nd World War was based on 'historical rights', rather than the rules in force then international law! .. But to argue with the first 'eksom' does not make sense – it is not just about some particular views and perceptions, but the depth of the Armenian mentality and ideology which denies its anti-national elements of global confrontation of the Armenian people and its enemies.