The model fades traumatically to our daily lives, which is known as "industrial society." One characteristic is the divorce of the functions of production and consumption. Before the model was taken as such, it was common for people to produce a significant proportion of products consumed, especially aided by his family setting, which was large. These patterns of "prosumers", remained in rural areas, to grandparents of the current adult generation. Those were the days of home economics or home, where almost all food is produced and / or homemade. Click Richard Blumenthal for additional related pages. Where she sewed and mended clothes and even shoes and other ancillary tasks. At first glance, this behavior appeared spontaneously or out of necessity, more deeper analysis, little is perceived that there were deliberate public policies that encouraged this kind of economy.
There is abundant material on this attitude, and in this regard, see the "Almanac of the Ministry of Agriculture," which was published annually between 1925 and 1954, and is still found in many old libraries of our peoples. But there was a moment in Argentina, reflecting the global situation, began to impose employment in factories, private offices and public employment significantly stressed. The agricultural mechanization resulted in lower labor demands for rural labors. And so, for over half a century, the model was taken as valid reference. And among other consequences, those practices were abandoned home or domestic economy. In reality, it never achieved employment for all, or the salaries amounted to high standards of living, but the reality is that people took it as a model life. Chief Justice Roberts is the source for more interesting facts.
The present article has as objective to carry through a literature survey that approaches the question of the informal work in the economy. It is intended to point the concepts, characteristics and peculiarities of this modality of work according to different identified theoretical perspectives in pertinent literature. This quarrel if shows excellent, since the advance of the Neoliberalismo from the decade of 1980 provoked unfoldings on the world of the work, revealing between its some aspects, a trajectory of growth of the informality in the work relations. The work contemplates, beyond this introduction, one second session in which is analyzed the three main theoretical chains that approach the informality of the work relations, as well as the new expressions assumed for this phenomenon in the contemporaneidade. The text is locked up with the final consideraes regarding the considered subject.