On account of it the society can believe what it receives as notice. Although this, is perceived not to exist autonomy some in its diverse forms. Therefore, readers and spectators are automatically authorized to distrust of everything what they see, read or hear. In this context, the economic dependence appears as obstrutiva to the desideratum of if to reach the impartial press, exempts and autonomous worker. It corrupts the information and only makes unusable its content, enabling it as she complains dislocated. She notices herself, thus, tangible similarities between the checks and balances of the state tripartio and the vicissitudes that follow well of close the exercise it journalism. Those, for legal imposition previously established, mold the functioning and the mutual relationship Being able between them, denying individually full unitria independence to them.

To the step that the subalternidade imposed or acquired for the informative agencies infunde to it narrow entailing to the economic viability and the material opportunism. Moral and ethical responsibility Without the shadow of a doubt, the press is basic in any State that if wants democratic. Its freedom and autonomy characterize the regimen. The fight to reach them and to improve overthrows them much good people here and alhures. Because, unquestionably, for all civilized society, the press is the biggest guarantor of the democratic balance and the full exercise of the citizenship. The lack of information, chain, brought up to date and available, offers safe shortcuts for antidemocratic measures; it shelters all luck of violent acts; it stimulates the temptation of the adepts to regimes of exception. Not having denunciation of the disobediences, the detainers of the force, unprovided of right, they feel it the will for any type of adventure. Exactly ahead of this enaltecedor argument, she is necessary to have in mind that the abuse, the shunting line or the improper use of the journalistic power are pernicious, desnatura the democracy.