To avoid this postulated the linguist, the media must be unarmed as any power, they should be put under popular control and its themes should not be impuestos by advertisers, or the owners or investors. This would be a true democracy. It is no exaggeration to say that the efforts devoted to controlling our lives are a recurring issue in the history of the world, with special emphasis in recent years, major changes in human relations and the world order scenario. In the 20th century, the great mass of citizens is evaluated as ignorant and rude, which gets into everything, his role is that of spectators rather than participants, except during those regular opportunities that we must choose between economic power responsible for private establishments usually known or the oligarchy, reality of our country, and many Latin American countries. It is what has given to call elections.

During the elections, public opinion is considered essentially irrelevant if it conflicts with the requests of the opulent minority possessing the country. A conclusive example, and there are many, it has to do with the international economic order, with the so-called trade agreements. The population, in general, opposes without moderators most of these things, as they clearly highlight the surveys, but these issues do not appear during the elections. They do not appear because the centers of power, the opulent minority, remains attached to the defence of the institutionalization of a particular socio-economic order. So these issues do not appear. What is discussed not worried too much. This is very normal, and takes direction from the admission that the role of the citizen, such as illiterate and consented to it gets into everything, implies that it should be reduced to the spectator. If citizenship, as it happens often, try to organize and engage in policy to participate, to press for their concerns, then a problem arises.