Supreme Board

Within the specific functions has been responsible to this Council, we have the following: appoint, prior public contest of merits and personal evaluation, judges and prosecutors at all levels. These appointments require the compliant vote of two thirds of the legal number of members. Ratify the judges and prosecutors at all levels every seven years. The unratified may not re-enter to the judiciary or the public prosecutor. The ratification process is independent of disciplinary measures.

Apply the sanction of dismissal to the vowels of the Supreme Court and Supreme prosecutors and, at the request of the Supreme Court or the Board of Supreme prosecutors, respectively, to the judges and prosecutors in all instances. The final, reasoned, and after hearing the interested party, resolution is inimpugnable. Extend the official title that accredits them to judges and prosecutors. In the case of Peru, in the formation of the National Council of the Magistracy, the institutionality of the country is represented: judiciary, public prosecutor’s Office, professional associations and public universities and private. Is formed by seven members who are called directors. Without prejudice to which we return later on this issue (under the heading corresponding to the shape of election of the members of the different Councils), they are elected: one, by members of the Supreme Court of the Republic.

One by prosecutors Supreme Board members. One by the guiding national universities. One by the rectors of private universities. One by the members in the various colleges of lawyers in the country. Two are elected by the members in the other professional schools of the country discounted the bar associations. As you can see, to the NJC spread you a Medullary function, within the organizational scheme, not only in the sector justice, but in our country’s legal and social life; Since the reform of the State appears in most of the countries of the region as a prerequisite for sustainable development and governance.

Council

l suffers from what you imagine, not by what happens really. But the reality is often not imaginarily hard. I would say that for humans too often things are truly difficult. There is nothing correct in his ideas about the facts. The unfortunate situations are a reality.

But there is one issue that is passed many times overlooked. The same real and unfortunate fact affects two people to different extent. It doesn’t matter that the interpretation made of the same fact is similar. For example, two men abandoned by their wives interpret everything what can be interpreted on the matter. However, one of them is shattered. While the other is perfectly quiet and adapted to the new situation. You can say that what happens is that one was more in love than the other. It can be no doubt that it has thus been.

And it is there where round the issue on which I would like to draw attention. People attributed to different level of importance to the same facts. And what is more, a person is able to decide what level of significance is going to be attributed to an unfortunate fact. And that is the real crux of the matter. Many people are not only miserable by the interpretation that makes a fact in particular. It is especially for the impact or importance attributed to this event. Because very often we make a tragedy of trivial situations. Overstated things that might be significant but are not so. And here goes the Council: to an annoying, quiet event that nothing has happened. Do not do a small or medium wave of misfortune, throughout a devastating tsunami. Before taking it to chest so think about all together misfortunes that you’ve already had to live and you have exceeded. Or better yet, think the worst misfortunes in this world and everything bad that could have happened and which did not happen. You don’t judge your problems in the abstract, do it as what it is, one more than everyone who has to deal with humanity. And believe me, most of the time our spiritual discomfort before a fact is no more than an exaggerated response.

National Assembly Law

Already the universities have spoken, they have been declared in emergency, for example, the University of the Andes, the ULA has commented that the universities Act that has just been adopted is a legal instrument authoritarian, whose objective is to equip the national Government a means to directly control the universities, that in case of being enacted would void his transcendent sense because the University would cease to be an institution for knowledge creationresearch and professionalization. With elimination University autonomy institution happens to be completely dependent on the Executive power, delegates to the Minister of higher education most of the powers of self-government University, to the extent even of assigning the guarantee of the exercise of autonomy of our houses of study. Unknown to the democratic and social State of law. The law includes concepts and items related to the Socialist education, endogenous development, modifies the academic community and the cloister, which holds university management to a Socialist project contrary to the promotion of pluralism, which was also rejected in the consultative referendum on constitutional reform on December 2, 2007 as very well codigovenezuela.com/2010, puts it with regard to the foregoing, that the National Council of University transformation aims to coordinate the implementation of policies arising from the Ministry and will have the largest number of representatives designated by the Executive. The territorial councils of University transformation will be created by the Minister, who regulate its organization and functioning, which breaks the possibility of University self-regulation and greater levels of efficiency. It is a highly discretionary law. The Minister shall regulate the creation of training of undergraduate and postgraduate programmes, policies of income and student permanence, the creation or elimination of Headquarters, core and extensions. Also regulate the participation of organizations of popular power, it shall draw up the electoral regulations for the election of the University authorities, the regulations for the operation of the University governing bodies, and will establish the guidelines for teacher training programs.

For its part, the University of Carabobo through his Chancellor Jessy Divo of Romero, asked Chavez, return to the National Assembly Law of university education, with the aim that the legislature remedied the multiple violations of constitutional, legal and regulatory order prior to its enactment. We consider if it really has pretensions to continue ruling the current President, rectify this decision, listen to the universities their proposals, suggestions and take corrective actions to not be affected in their aspirations. These errors may not commit, because it is extremely negative for the objectives of the Government of instituting a socialism but always within a true democracy.

Missiology 58

Continuation of missiology classes audio recordings: what are the largest groups in the Peru? Methodological impossible to find a theoretical definition, not even pragmatic of what sect, box became to get a definition or criteria. It is divided into 3 blocks. 1. Christian groups: are all Evangelical churches. Who are evangelicals?, are Protestant, or not? Or they themselves could give an answer. A Methodist will tell you that it is more Protestant than Evangelical. A Baptist can tell you that it is more evangelical than Protestant.

A Presbyterian will tell you that it is Evangelical, but Anglican branch. We are left with an idea at least in the Peru: Evangelicals, are the children of Protestants in what sense? Protestants in general definition, are those who are born in the 16th century, Lutherans, Calvinists what we call Evangelicals in general arise at the end of the 17TH century and at the beginning of the 18th, with the Methodism. But that occurs within Anglicanism, will follow a series of questions. But what we are interested is not studying the overall universe of groups that emerge from the reform, if not, basically the arriving in the Peru. When we talk about in the Peru, Evangelicals, we speak of all denominations that are more than 150 Evangelical denominations. What the Pentecostals are evangelicals? If the missionary Christian praise is Evangelical? If.

Water alive if it is more the founder pastor John, has been eminent Catholic, principal of the #3 school of the Catholic charismatic renewal, in 1983. Evangelicals, would come to be all these denominations have a self-contained pastor, but that generally meet in an institution called CONEP. (National Evangelical Council of the Peru) Are evangelicals Christians? More us, of course that they are Christians. Moreover are Christ centric. Christ, the Bible and point. What the? three fonts of the transmission of revelation? They are: Sacred Scripture, the living tradition and the Magisterium of the Church. Generally the evangelicals, they have the Bible, and do not accept the Magisterium nor tradition. They are as Christians, that do not accept another influence. Why is that they do not accept the Virgin Mary. Not because they have rejection to the Virgin, if not because say it will slightly distort the message of Christ. Because there is one mediator between God and men, and is Jesus Christ. In his preaching, a church you don’t preach. You preach Jesus Christ, and the conversion John 3-3, 1st Corinthians 5-17. Everything is the Kerygma of the primitive Christian Church. The Kerygmatic preaching, witness and proclamation part. They are basically movements of conversion. To evangelize, they are so advanced. Most of them have been Catholics for his post. They are Neo converts but his point basically is to preach the Gospel. I always say: an evangelical not evangelizing, It is Protestant, and a Protestant who has become Evangelical, not evangelizing to me the distinction of Protestant and Evangelical, is not doctrinal, but rather dynamic Church.

Pastoral Council

So after Christmas celebration, do you know this concern to the pastor. Father Luis after meditating this concern, gives shape and decides to create a unique Ministry of singing, and this decides to designate a general representative. The father decides to appoint me to that position, but perhaps without realizing that still had a sector that he felt rejection towards my person, (but that was not my intention to suggest my concern, because within the choirs at that time, there were redeemable people who could take that position with great dedication, and especially young people. Father Louis had already decided so, and so did know. I could not decline the invitation to think, and will with certainty that through him, is the same Jesus who was calling me for this service. Arrived Easter, and was attached to all the choirs for the feast, I had an absolute rejection, and only played the choir to which I belonged. Later it was agreed at Pastoral Council with our pastor at the head, draw up a general regulation for all choirs, in order to unify them, and the custom was for me.

Taking into account the reality and the existing problems in the chorus I had to used a very strict criterion. This regulation hard and severe, reflected the conflicts that wanted to banish. I think that if reality had been another, the regulation should have been different. The regulation was presented in the parish, (ECP), coordination team and decided that choruses to see and they will review it and corrected. At this point I would like to dwell a moment to express my point of view. I did not agree and discrepe of this decision, I believe that the economic situation and the problematic coral in this parish is persistent, and could not be put in the hands of people who constantly come into personal conflicts, review of something that lights hurt them in his personal act.